MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002117445 · doi:10.1063/1.4790415

The Poincaré algebra in rank 3 simple Lie algebras

2013· article· en· W2002117445 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Douglas, Hubert de Guise, Joe Repka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCity University of New York
KeywordsCombinatoricsLie algebraRank (graph theory)MathematicsEmbeddingIndecomposable moduleSimple (philosophy)AutomorphismPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We classify embeddings of the Poincaré algebra \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1) into the rank 3 simple Lie algebras. Up to inner automorphism, we show that there are exactly two embeddings of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1) into \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {sl}(4,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}sl(4,C), which are, however, related by an outer automorphism of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {sl}(4,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}sl(4,C). Next, we show that there is a unique embedding of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1) into \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {so}(7,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}so(7,C), up to inner automorphism, but no embeddings of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1) into \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {sp}(6,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}sp(6,C). All embeddings are explicitly described. As an application, we show that each irreducible highest weight module of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {sl}(4,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}sl(4,C) (not necessarily finite-dimensional) remains indecomposable when restricted to \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1), with respect to any embedding of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {p}(3,1)$\end{document}p(3,1) into \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathfrak {sl}(4,\mathbb {C})$\end{document}sl(4,C).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207