MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002161675 · doi:10.1021/ma034980u

Polysulfone-<i>g</i><i>raft</i>-poly(<i>tert</i>-butyl acrylate):  Synthesis, Nanophase Separation, Poly(<i>tert</i>-butyl acrylate) Hydrolysis, and pH-Dependent Iridescence

2003· article· he· W2002161675 on OpenAlexaff
Zhihua Lu, Guojun Liu, Scott Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2003
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysulfoneAcrylateButyl acrylatePolymer chemistryMaterials scienceCopolymerAcrylic acidHydrolysisIridescenceChemical engineeringChemistryPolymerOrganic chemistryComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polysulfone- graft -poly( tert -butyl acrylate) or PSf- g -P t BA samples were prepared by reacting lithiated Udel polysulfone (PSf) in THF at −78 °C with bromine-end-functionalized poly( tert -butyl acrylate) or P t BA-Br. In bulk, the P t BA branches segregated from the PSf backbone to form nanometer-sized domains. The P t BA domain shape changed from wormlike to cylindrical and to lamellar as its volume fraction increased from 19.2% to 44%. While the wormlike and cylindrical morphologies lacked long-range order, the alternating P t BA and PSf lamellae were packed regularly. The P t BA domains in such graft copolymer films could be hydrolyzed to yield poly(acrylic acid) or PAA chains without affecting film integrity. After P t BA hydrolysis, a sample with a P t BA volume fraction of 38% showed iridescence or a 1-D photonic stop band at ∼450 nm in basic water. The iridescence could be turned off and on by cycling pH between 2 and 10, for example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207