MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002187875 · doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e3181616c9d

Transmastoid Superior Semicircular Canal Occlusion

2008· article· en· W2002187875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOtology & Neurotology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSemicircular canalDehiscenceMiddle cranial fossaVestibular systemOcclusionPosterior Semicircular CanalSurgeryTemporal boneOtologic Surgical ProceduresFacial canalMiddle earAudiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The traditional surgical repair for superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) involves either canal plugging or resurfacing via the middle cranial fossa approach. We describe a novel transmastoid occlusion technique. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three patients with symptomatic computed tomography-proven SSCD. INTERVENTION: Transmastoid superior semicircular canal occlusion using bone pate in 2 fenestrations, with 1 placed on either side of the dehiscence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing and vestibular symptoms. RESULTS: Two patients were primary cases of SSCD, and a third patient had failed a previous middle fossa occlusion using fascia at an outside institution. In all 3 cases, the 2 sides of the superior semicircular canal adjacent to the dehiscence were occluded using bone pate, formed from a mix of bone dust and fibrin sealant. This allowed for a permanent bony partition to be achieved between the dehiscence and the remainder of the labyrinth. In all cases, hearing was either preserved or improved, and the procedure was successful in controlling vestibular symptoms. CONCLUSION: Transmastoid superior semicircular canal occlusion is a viable alternative to the customary middle fossa approach for superior canal dehiscence. Meticulous technique and the use of bone pate may help maximize auditory and vestibular results. Advantages of this technique include obviating a craniotomy, preclusion of temporal lobe retraction, familiarity of the approach for experienced otologists, and the ability to occlude the canal without manipulating the defect. The transmastoid approach for superior canal occlusion may not be possible when the dura is low hanging or when there is extensive cranial base dehiscence requiring reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it