MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Wrinkles on the Circumferential Strength of a Cast-in-Place Composite Polymer Liner Used in Retrofitting Pressure Pipes

2010· article· en· W2002189664 on OpenAlexafffund
Nancy Ampiah, Amir Fam, Ian D. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWrinkleMaterials scienceRetrofittingComposite materialComposite numberCrackingPolymerUltimate tensile strengthCompression (physics)Internal pressureStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines a cast-in-place composite polymer liner used in retrofitting cracked cast iron pressure water pipes. The installation of the liner can result in the formation of geometric imperfections (wrinkles) of different patterns and sizes if the external circumference of the liner exceeds the internal circumference of the host pipe. A series of split-disk tests were conducted on 25-mm wide ring samples of the polymer liner to examine the effects of the presence of three different wrinkle configurations, the loading rate, and cyclic loading on the circumferential strength of the liner. In all the test samples, cracking of the resin occurred at the wrinkle, but ultimate capacity was always greater than the cracking load. A reduction in the ultimate hoop strength of up to 23% occurred, depending on the wrinkle pattern. Cyclic loading corresponding to 50-year service life was applied, leading the resin in some samples to crack at the wrinkle. At a very slow loading rate of 0.1 mm/min, the ultimate strength of the liner was reduced by 16%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207