MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002229541 · doi:10.1139/v02-164

Potentiometric study of equilibrium acidities of some carbon acids in acetonitrile

2002· article· en· W2002229541 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Stańczyk-Dunaj, Włodzimierz Gałęzowski, Arnold Jarczewski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPotentiometric titrationTetrabutylammonium hydroxideAcetonitrileHydroxideIonic strengthElectroanalytical methodInorganic chemistryGlass electrodeBase (topology)Glassy carbonIonAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryElectrodeElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryReference electrodeCyclic voltammetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pKa values for 30 C-acids of the type CH·R1·R2·R3 — where the R1, R2, and R3 substituents are H, alkyl, and aryl, and the most common electron withdrawing groups used in studies of proton-transfer reaction — are given herein. The pKa values have been measured potentiometrically in acetonitrile, using a glass electrode. These values were determined in a buffer solution consisting of a C-acid and its tetrabutylammonium salt, at constant ionic strength (0.001 M), at 25°C. The measurements were done under nitrogen, to prevent oxidation of the anion. The influence of water within the sample of the tetrabutylammonium hydroxide base was negligible. The lowest pKa value of 19.1 was found for bis(4-nitrophenyl)cyanomethane, while the largest pKas that could be measured were limited by the basicity of the hydroxide ion, and did not exceed 28. A satisfactory agreement between spectrophotometric and potentiometric acidities was achieved. Key words: C-acids, pKa values, acetonitrile, potentiometry, proton transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207