MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of α - and β -adrenergic stimulation on hepatosplanchnic perfusion and oxygen extraction in endotoxic shock

2001· article· en· W2002252836 on OpenAlexaff
Haibo Zhang, Daniel De Backer, Soumaya Cherkaoui, Bernard Vray, Jean‐Louis Vincent

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicinePhenylephrineCardiac indexAnesthesiaCardiac outputArteryFemoral arterySuperior mesenteric arteryPulmonary artery catheterPerfusionBlood flowShock (circulatory)HemodynamicsBlood pressureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of adrenergic stimulation on hepatosplanchnic perfusion, oxygen extraction, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production during endotoxic shock. DESIGN: In vivo, prospective, randomized, controlled, repeated-measures, experimental study. SETTING: Experimental physiology laboratory in a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs. INTERVENTIONS: An intrapericardial catheter was positioned. Catheters for blood sampling were inserted into the right femoral artery, hepatic vein, portal vein, and pulmonary artery. Ultrasonic flow probes were placed around the portal vein, the hepatic artery, the mesenteric artery, the left renal artery, and the left femoral artery. Animals received 2 mg/kg of Escherichia coli endotoxin, followed by fluid resuscitation. Seven dogs received intravenous isoproterenol (0.1 microg/kg x min(-1)), seven received phenylephrine (1 microg/kg x min(-1)), and seven served as controls. Thirty minutes later, cardiac tamponade was introduced to study organ perfusion and tissue oxygen extraction capabilities. MAIN RESULTS: The isoproterenol group had a higher cardiac index and stroke index and lower systemic vascular resistance than the other groups. The phenylephrine group had a higher arterial pressure but a lower cardiac index than the isoproterenol group. The isoproterenol group had a higher hepatic artery blood flow than the other groups and a higher portal and mesenteric flow than the control group. Liver and gut mucosal blood flow was greater in the isoproterenol than in the phenylephrine group. The isoproterenol group had a lower global critical oxygen delivery than the other groups (8.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 13.1 +/- 2.0 (control) and 11.8 +/- 3.3 mL/kg x min(-1) (phenylephrine); both p < .05) and a higher liver critical oxygen extraction ratio than the control group. Isoproterenol tended to attenuate, but phenylephrine significantly increased, blood tumor necrosis factor levels. CONCLUSIONS: During endotoxic shock, beta-stimulation can improve hepatosplanchnic perfusion and enhance tissue oxygen extraction capabilities, whereas alpha-stimulation does not. In addition, alpha-adrenergic stimulation can increase tumor necrosis factor levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207