Intraesophageal acid perfusion sensitizes the esophagus to mechanical distension: a Barostat study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of noncardiac chest pain is unclear. Increased gastroesophageal reflux and decreased pain thresholds to intraesophageal balloon distension have been demonstrated in a proportion of such patients. We aimed to investigate whether acid exposure sensitizes esophageal mechanoreceptors in healthy volunteers. METHODS: After an overnight fast, an infinitely compliant balloon, 4.5 cm in length and mounted on a multilumen transnasal manometry catheter, was placed 8.5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter in 12 healthy male volunteers aged 18-39 yr. After determination of the minimal distending pressure, the balloon was inflated up to 48 mm Hg by means of a computer-controlled barostat (G & J Electronics, Canada). Graded stepwise distensions were interspersed with random decreases in pressure to two-thirds of the previous value. At each pressure level, the subjects were asked to report on sensation and the presence of pain. Baseline distension was repeated to determine reproducibility of the pressure/volume relationship and also the perception and pain thresholds. After the baseline distension sequence, the esophagus was perfused for 20 min (at 7 ml/min) with either normal saline (control) or 0.1 N hydrochloric acid at 37 degrees C on a random basis. RESULTS: Basal sensory thresholds varied widely (first perception 5-36 mm Hg, pain 8 > or = 43 mm Hg). Two subjects did not experience pain up to the maximum distending pressure (42 and 43 mm Hg, respectively, after correction for the minimal distending pressure). Esophageal body compliance was similar on repeat distension. Sensory thresholds were reproducible with different distensions (perception r = 0.99, pain r = 0.95). Saline resulted in no significant changes in perception or pain thresholds. Acid perfusion reduced first perception (median before and after acid, 15 mm Hg and 8 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0.05) and pain threshold (median before and after acid, 32.5 mm Hg and 26.5 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0.05). When compared to changes after saline perfusion, acid perfusion reduced the perception threshold (median change, -3.8 mm Hg vs 0 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and tended to reduce the pain threshold (median change, -3.75 mm Hg vs +0.75 mm Hg, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Intraesophageal balloon distension using a barostat is a reproducible method of measuring esophageal body compliance and sensory thresholds. Acute exposure to acid seems to sensitize the esophagus to perception from intraluminal balloon distension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".