Well Integrity and Workover Candidates for Existing Wells in the Wabamun Area CO2 Sequestration Project (WASP)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Geological storage of CO2 requires that policy makers, regulatory agencies, and industry ensure that these operations are safe for the public and that sequestered CO2 is permanently removed from the atmosphere. One possible risk identified with storing CO2 into the subsurface is the potential for leakage through existing wells penetrating the cap rock. This study evaluated the well integrity for existing wells in the Wabamun Area as part of a University of Calgary lead study which examined the feasibility of storing 20 Mt-CO2/year for 50 years within 60 km of Wabamun (WASP- Wabamun area CO2 Sequestration Project). A number of large stationary CO2 emitters are located in central Alberta with cumulative annual emissions in the order of 30 Mt CO2. A discrete approach was taken where each individual well was investigated and the need for any additional workovers were on the basis of a decision matrix developed based on current knowledge of well integrity for CO2 injection schemes. When analyzing the existing well population only 4 out of 27 wells were identified as work over candidates. This result demonstrates that well leakage from existing wells is less of a mitigation problem than was first anticipated for this area. For the existing wells only a few had production casing installed through the Nisku formation, which is a situation more prone towards leakage. The other wells had cement plugs through the cap rock with a cement type that will prevent leakage through the Calmar shale. For existing wells that do require work overs, it is recommended they be performed prior to pressurizing the reservoir area. The cost and complexity of properly abandoning these wells will be higher at higher pressures or when CO2 and possibly H2S are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".