Outbreak of Egg Drop Syndrome in Bangladesh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An incident alike to egg-drop syndrome (EDS) occurred in commercial egg laying chickens in Gazipur district,Bangladesh from July to November 2005. The chickens showed decreased egg production along with production ofshell less and soft shelled eggs when they were at predicted peak production age. Nutritional status, especially crudeprotein (16.65-18.50%) and calcium (2.15-3.62%) content of the supplied feed was within the range. Virological andserological investigations on causes of decreased egg production and production of soft-shelled and shell less egg by thelaying hens revealed that the responsible causative agent is EDS virus. Total seven EDS viruses were isolated fromcloacal swab (4), soft-shelled eggs (2) and feces (1). The isolation rate 71.43% (5/7) was higher in second passage thanin first passage 28.57% (2/7) in duck embryos. None of the 7 viruses grew in chicken embryo even after second passage.All five flocks tested, were vaccinated against infectious bronchitis and Newcastle disease along with other commonvaccines generally used in Bangladesh but not against EDS. Serological investigation revealed that birds in all testedfarms (100%) had antibody against EDS virus (in 2 farms in 100% samples and in 3 farms in 80% samples). The sourceof the virus remained to be determined. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of EDS outbreak inBangladesh. To save poultry industry in Bangladesh from harm of this disease the biosecurity measures should bestrictly followed along with vaccination against the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".