MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002408025 · doi:10.1353/cjs.2005.0011

"Grand" Expectations: The Experiences of Grandparents and Adult Grandchildren

2004· article· en· W2002408025 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Candace L. Kemp

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrandparentNormativeAmbivalenceSociologyContext (archaeology)NegotiationHumanitiesSocial psychologyPsychologySocial sciencePolitical scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the context of social and demographic change and in dialogue with theories of individualization and the concept of intergenerational ambivalence, this paper explores the existence of normative "grand" role expectations among grandparents and adult grandchildren. The data from qualitative life-history interviews with both generations (n=37) indicate that while sometimes proscriptive rather than prescriptive, there are identifiable, albeit general, normative behavioral expectations associated with both familial roles. According to both generations' accounts, these expectations are instructive and provide a general framework as individuals negotiate and evaluate their interactions and relationships with one another. Placed within a wider social context, these expectations reflect and reinforce cultural emphasis on personal freedom and independence, as well as prevailing social discourses relating to youth, old age and family life. Résumé Dans un contexte de changement social et démographique et de dialogue relatif aux théories de l'individualisation et du concept de l'ambivalence entre les générations, cet article explore l'existence d'attentes « normatives » du rôle de grands-parents chez les grands-parents et les petits-enfants adultes. Les données provenant d'entrevues qualitatives sur les cycles de vie avec les deux générations (n=37) indiquent que, bien qu'il s'agisse souvent de proscriptions plutôt que de prescriptions, il existe bel et bien des attentes normatives identifiables, quoique générales, en matière de comportement relativement aux deux rôles familiaux. Selon les témoignages des deux générations, ces attentes s'avèrent révélatrices et fournissent un cadre général permettant aux individus de négocier et d'évaluer les interactions et relations qu'ils entretiennent l'un avec l'autre. Vu dans un contexte social plus large, ces attentes traduisent et renforcent l'importance culturelle de la liberté et indépendance personnelle ainsi que les discours sociaux dominant en matière de jeunes, d'aînés et de la vie de famille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207