MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002414354 · doi:10.1029/2006jd007157

Precipitation of southwestern Canada: Wavelet, scaling, multifractal analysis, and teleconnection to climate anomalies

2007· article· en· W2002414354 on OpenAlex
Thian Yew Gan, Adam Kenea Gobena, Qiang Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsGreenfield Research (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleconnectionPacific decadal oscillationPrecipitationClimatologyMultifractal systemEnvironmental scienceIntermittencyEl Niño Southern OscillationAtmospheric sciencesGeologyGeographyMeteorologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using wavelets, statistically significant interannual and interdecadal oscillations that occurred haphazardly have been detected in southwestern (SW) Canadian seasonal precipitation anomalies. At interannual scales, station precipitation anomalies show unstable relations with large‐scale climate anomalies such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Pacific/North America (PNA), East Pacific (EP) and West Pacific (WP) patterns, and the Central North Pacific (CNP) index. Not all significant precipitation activities could be matched by similar activities in one or more climate anomalies considered. Inconsistent wavelet coherence and phase difference between the leading principal components (PC) of regional precipitation anomalies and climate indices as well as weak Pearson's correlations between band‐passed precipitation PCs and climate indices for the 2–3 year and 3–8 year scales provide supporting evidence for unstable precipitation climate relationships at the interannual scale. On the other hand, interdecadal precipitation variability is mainly associated with low‐frequency variability in CNP, PDO and ENSO. Composite analysis of winter precipitation shows that ENSO, PDO, PNA and WP offer better separation of positive and negative precipitation anomalies than EP and CNP. However, the effect of ENSO is found to be stronger than the others. Precipitation power spectrum plots mostly reveal two linear decay regions of different slopes separated by a breakpoint located approximately at 20 to 30 days, while empirical probability plots reveal power law behavior and hyperbolic intermittency in these data, whose correlation dimensions ( D 2 ) are between 8 and 9. Different multifractal behaviors are observed among stations because the amount of different rainfall generating mechanisms vary from station to station, as reflected by the haphazard nature of oscillations detected in most precipitation data. Although the leading PCs of winter regional precipitation show modest correlations at zero‐ to three‐season lead times with ENSO and PDO indices, the high D 2 values and absence of consistent interannual precipitation activities suggest that prediction of SW Canadian seasonal precipitation by teleconnection with climate indices is likely limited. Adding other predictor fields such as sea surface temperature and/or sea level pressure may be useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it