Three-Dimensional Classification of Spinal Deformities Using Fuzzy Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A prospective study of a large set of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of spinal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Objectives. To determine the value of fuzzy clustering techniques to automatically detect clinically relevant 3D curve patterns within this set of 3D spine models. Summary of Background Data. Classification is important for the assessment of AIS and has been mainly used to guide surgical treatment. Current classification systems are based on visual curve pattern identification using two-dimensional radiologic measurements but remain controversial because of their low interobserver and intraobserver reliability. A clinically useful 3D classification remains to be found. Methods. An unsupervised learning algorithm, fuzzy k-means clustering, was applied on 409 3D spine models. Analysis of data distribution using clinical parameters was performed by studying similar curve patterns, near each cluster center identified. Results. The algorithm determined that the entire sample of models could be segmented in five easily differentiated curve patterns similar to those of the Lenke and King classifications. Furthermore, a system with 12 classes made possible the identification of subpatterns of spinal deformity with true 3D components. Conclusions. Automatic and clinically relevant 3D classification of AIS is possible using an unsupervised learning algorithm. This approach can now be used to build a relevant 3D classification of AIS using appropriate key features of 3D models selected by a panel of expert spinal deformity surgeons. An unsupervised mathematical learning algorithm was used to automatically detect clinically relevant two-dimensional and three-dimensional curve patterns within a large set of three-dimensional spine reconstructions with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and suggests that this approach can be used to build a relevant and useful three-dimensional classification system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".