MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002521218 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.10.1178c

<i>Botrytis porri</i> in Onion Seed Crops and Onion Seed

2002· article· en· W2002521218 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lindsey J. du Toit, M. L. Derie, Tom Hsiang, Gary Q. Pelter

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPotato dextrose agarAlliumBotrytisHorticultureAgarSporeSclerotiumLiliumBotanyBulbLiliaceaeOrnamental plantAgar plateVeterinary medicineBotrytis cinereaBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nine fields direct-seeded with onion (Allium cepa L.) were surveyed in central Washington in the spring and summer of 2001 for Botrytis species associated with onion seed crops produced in this semiarid region. Forty plants were sampled from each field in a 'W' pattern in April, and 20 plants were similarly sampled from each field in June and July. Each plant was placed in a separate plastic bag, stored at 4 ± 2°C for 3 to 5 weeks, sliced lengthwise using a knife sterilized with 70% ethyl alcohol, incubated in a moist chamber for 5 days, and examined under a dissecting microscope. Fungal growth resembling Botrytis spp. was transferred to acidified potato dextrose agar (PDA) for species identification based on colony morphology, rate of growth, and spore and sclerotium characteristics (3). Cultures were incubated on a laboratory bench at 24 ± 4°C with 8 to 16 h of daylight. A species resembling B. porri (3) was detected in 3 fields in April at an incidence ranging from 3 to 28%, and in 2 of the same 3 fields in each of June and July at incidences ranging from 5 to 10%. Infected plants were asymptomatic at the time of sampling. The isolates formed brown, cerebriform sclerotia and sporulated sparsely. Subsamples of seed harvested from each field were assayed for Botrytis spp. To detect internal infection, 400 seeds from each of the nine fields were soaked in 0.525% NaOCl for 60 s, triple-rinsed in sterile deionized water, air dried, placed on a selective agar medium (2) with 20 seed per 9-cm-diameter petri plate, and incubated at 24°C (12 h day/night) for 14 days. Seeds were examined 5, 10, and 14 days after plating, and fungi resembling Botrytis spp. were transferred to acidified PDA for species determination. Isolates resembling B. porri were detected in 0.75% of seed from two of the three fields in which this species was isolated from plant samples. The internal transcribed spacer 1 region of ribosomal DNA of four isolates of the putative B. porri (two from plant samples and two from seed) were sequenced, and all four sequences matched that of B. porri registered in GenBank (Accession No. Z99666) most closely. Botrytis porri is a pathogen of garlic (A. sativum L.), leek (A. porrum L.), and wild garlic (A. vineale L.), but can infect onion and shallot (A. ascalonicum L.) when inoculated on these hosts (1). To our knowledge, this is the first report of natural infection of onion by B. porri, and the first report of seedborne B. porri on onion. References: (1) W. R. Jarvis. Pathology. Page 62 in: Botryotinia and Botrytis Species: Taxonomy, Physiology, and Pathogenicity. Canada Department of Agriculture, Monograph No. 15, 1977. (2) G. Kritzman and D. Netzer. Phytoparasitica 6:3, 1978. (3) A. H. Presly. Plant Pathol. 34:422, 1985.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207