GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor gene expression in rat cortex: Differential effects of two chronic diazepam treatment regimes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diazepam is widely prescribed as an anxiolytic but its therapeutic application is limited because with daily use tolerance develops to certain aspects of its pharmacological profile. We compared the effects of two dosing paradigms on GABA(A) receptor gene expression and benzodiazepine binding characteristics. Equivalent daily doses of 15 mg/kg/day diazepam were delivered either via constant infusion or daily subcutaneous injection for 14 days. The two distinct treatment regimes produced significantly different changes in GABA(A) receptor alpha4-, beta2-, beta3- and gamma1-subunit mRNA steady-state levels. Similar changes in the GABA enhancement of flunitrazepam binding and the BZ3/BZ2 subtype ratio determined ex vivo were produced, however, significant differences were found in [(3)H]-Ro 15-4513 binding between cortical tissue from diazepam injected animals compared with diazepam infused animals. Our data suggest that it is the diurnal fluctuations in receptor occupancy that are responsible for the different effects produced by these two dosing regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".