MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002547708 · doi:10.1063/1.2138801

Annealing-environment effects on the properties of CoPt nanoparticles formed in single-crystal Al2O3 by ion implantation

2005· article· en· W2002547708 on OpenAlexaff
C. W. White, S. P. Withrow, J. D. Budai, D. K. Thomas, J.M. Williams, A. Meldrum, K. D. Sorge, J. R. Thompson, G. W. Ownby, J. F. Wendelken, L. A. Boatner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)NanoparticleMaterials scienceAlloyCoercivityIon implantationFerromagnetismCrystal structureChemical engineeringIonNanotechnologyCrystallographyMetallurgyChemistryCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ion implantation of nearly equal doses of Co and Pt into a single-crystal Al2O3 host followed by thermal annealing leads to the formation of nanoparticles whose phase, structure, and physical properties are strongly dependent on the annealing environment. Annealing in 96%Ar+4%H2 gives rise to ferromagnetic, chemically ordered CoPt nanoparticles with the L10 structure and a magnetic coercivity that can exceed 10kOe at 5K. Annealing in O2 (or in Ar) does not result in the formation of a CoPt alloy. Instead, the implanted Pt precipitates to form oriented elemental Pt nanoparticles, and the implanted Co combines with oxygen to form Co3O4 oxide nanoparticles. Annealing in ultrahigh-vacuum conditions results in a mixture of phases including CoPt3 and Co3O4 and possibly Co. The results obtained for Co+Pt-implanted Al2O3 are compared with the previous results for Fe+Pt-implanted Al2O3 annealed in similar environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207