MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002616191 · doi:10.1002/cbdv.201100418

Electrochemical Investigations of Tau Protein Phosphorylations and Interactions with Pin1

2012· article· en· W2002616191 on OpenAlexaff
Sanela Martić, Samaneh Beheshti, Heinz‐Bernhard Kraatz, David W. Litchfield

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry & Biodiversity · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPIN1ChemistryPhosphorylationIsomeraseDielectric spectroscopyTau proteinBiophysicsPeptidylprolyl isomeraseElectrochemistryBiochemistryEnzymeElectrodeAlzheimer's diseasePhysical chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorylation of Tau by the protein kinase GSK-3β was monitored by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of immobilized Tau on gold surfaces. As a result of Tau phosphorylation, the film resistance decreases significantly due to conformational changes and reorganization of the immobilized phosphorylated Tau (pTau) protein, which in turn enables the interactions of pTau with the peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase, Pin1. Interactions are specific to phospho-Ser (pSer) and phospho-Thr (pThr) residues of pTau. Impedance changes occurred as a function of pTau-Pin1 interactions and are related to the amount of Pin1 bound, which resulted in an increase of the charge-transfer resistance, R(CT). Our results clearly indicate that the isomerase Pin1 interacts favorably with pSer/pThr-Pro residues in Tau, but does not bind non-phosphorylated Tau or phospho-Tyr residues in Tau films. Our study demonstrates the utility of electrochemical impedance studies to probe protein modifications and biomolecular interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry & BiodiversitySame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207