MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determinants of Health Utility in Lung and Heart-Lung Transplant Recipients

2005· article· en· W2002662478 on OpenAlexaff
L.G. Singer, Michael K. Gould, George Tomlinson, James Theodore

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchiolitis obliteransQuartileLung transplantationLungBody mass indexInternal medicineCreatinineCardiologyTransplantationConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) following lung and heart-lung transplantation, but few other determinants of HRQL have been described. We performed a cross-sectional study of standard gamble utility, a preference-based measure of HRQL, in 90 stable lung and heart-lung transplant recipients. We used bivariate analyses and multiple linear regression to evaluate associations between utility scores and candidate predictor variables including age, sex, indication for transplant (obstructive, interstitial, suppurative and pulmonary vascular diseases), transplant type (bilateral, single and heart-lung),time since transplant, body mass index, arterial PO2,creatinine clearance, number of medications, presence of BOS and risk-attitude score. The median utility was 0.88 (inter-quartile range: 0.50–0.99).Multivariable analysis showed that female sex, absence of BOS, better renal function and longer time since transplantation were associated with higher utility scores, and that there were utility differences across diagnostic groups. Although BOS is a major determinant of utility following lung and heart-lung transplantation, other demographic and clinical factors are also associated with significant differences in this measure of HRQL. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) following lung and heart-lung transplantation, but few other determinants of HRQL have been described. We performed a cross-sectional study of standard gamble utility, a preference-based measure of HRQL, in 90 stable lung and heart-lung transplant recipients. We used bivariate analyses and multiple linear regression to evaluate associations between utility scores and candidate predictor variables including age, sex, indication for transplant (obstructive, interstitial, suppurative and pulmonary vascular diseases), transplant type (bilateral, single and heart-lung),time since transplant, body mass index, arterial PO2,creatinine clearance, number of medications, presence of BOS and risk-attitude score. The median utility was 0.88 (inter-quartile range: 0.50–0.99).Multivariable analysis showed that female sex, absence of BOS, better renal function and longer time since transplantation were associated with higher utility scores, and that there were utility differences across diagnostic groups. Although BOS is a major determinant of utility following lung and heart-lung transplantation, other demographic and clinical factors are also associated with significant differences in this measure of HRQL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207