MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002765389 · doi:10.1525/auk.2011.11057

Phylogeography of the Barred Owl (<i>Strix varia</i>): Species limits, multiple refugia, and range expansion

2011· article· en· W2002765389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George F. Barrowclough, Jeff G. Groth, Karan J. Odom, Jonas E. Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Auk · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Ornithologists' Union
KeywordsPhylogeographyRange (aeronautics)CladeMonophylyPopulationTaxonGeographyBiologyEcologyNucleotide diversityZoologyHaplotypePhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Barred Owl (Strix varia) is a common nonmigratory owl distributed across southern Canada, south to California in the west, and to Texas and Florida in the east, with isolated populations in central Mexico. We examined the genetic structure of Barred Owl populations throughout their range using 500–600 base pairs each of one nuclear and three mitochondrial genes. In 75% of the shortest trees and 64% of the bootstrapped trees, Barred Owls were not monophyletic; rather, S. v. sartorii of Mexico was separated from the remaining taxa of S. varia by S. fulvescens of Central America. Consequently, the Barred Owls of Mexico are a species-level taxon. There was a large component (32%) of genetic variance distributed among population samples from the United States and Canada because of the occurrence of two clades of haplotypes (4.8% sequence divergence) with differing geographic distributions. One clade was predominant along the Atlantic Coast and the second in the south-central United States. The two clades co-occurred from the central Gulf Coast to the Upper Midwest, and across Canada to the Pacific. Nucleotide diversity was greatest where the clades overlapped in occurrence; mismatch distributions possessed the signatures of population expansion from the southern and eastern states to northern and western locations. These results suggest two Pleistocene refugia for northern populations of Barred Owls. Diversity within populations and divergence between haplotype clades varied by an order of magnitude among the three mitochondrial genes, but each recovered the overall phylogeographic pattern. The nuclear sequences showed much less variation and differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AukSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207