MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002931314 · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600874

Both high intratumoral microvessel density determined using CD105 antibody and elevated plasma levels of CD105 in colorectal cancer patients correlate with poor prognosis

2003· article· en· W2002931314 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Li, Razan Gardy, Ben K. Seon, Sarah Duff, S Abdalla, Andrew G. Renehan, Sarah O’Dwyer, N. Haboubi, S. Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Cancer · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoglinAngiogenesisMedicineColorectal cancerMetastasisCD34PathologyInternal medicineCarcinomaGastroenterologyCancerBiologyStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD105 and its ligand transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) are modulators of angiogenesis, which drives tumour growth and metastasis. Tumour microvessel density (MVD) has proven to be an important determinant of prognosis. In this study, we have examined the prognostic value of MVD identified using Mabs to the pan-endothelial marker CD34 and to CD105 in 111 patients with colorectal cancer. The Mab to CD105 preferentially reacts with angiogenic endothelial cells. Of the 111 patients studied, 38 were alive and 73 had died of the disease. The median MVD values counted using anti-CD34 and anti-CD105 were 5 (range 1.40-9.00) and 3.10 (range 0.90-8.00), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that only MVD values obtained using CD105 Mab correlated with survival. Patients with a high MVD, above the median (3.10), showed the worst prognosis. A similar outcome was observed when MVD was divided into quartiles. In order to ascertain if this strong expression of CD105 in the tumour vasculature is reflected in patients' plasma, circulating levels of CD105, TGFbeta1 and TGFbeta3 together with the receptor-ligand complexes were quantified in patients with colorectal carcinoma and normal controls. Results showed that except for TGFbeta1, the levels of all other molecules were significantly elevated compared with controls. The levels of CD105 were positively correlated with Dukes' stages. A lower TGFbeta1 level was noted in patients with carcinoma over the controls. Furthermore, TGFbeta3 and CD105/TGFbeta3 complexes were markedly lowered in postoperative compared with preoperative plasma samples. Immunostaining revealed that TGFbeta1 was expressed in cancer cells but TGFbeta3 in the stromal cells, whereas CD105 was exclusively expressed in vascular endothelial cells of tumour blood vessels. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that MVD quantified using a Mab to CD105 is an independent prognostic parameter for survival of patients with colorectal cancer, and that plasma levels of CD105, TGFbeta1, TGFbeta3 and CD105/TGFbeta complexes may be useful markers for assessing disease progression. These data have led us to propose that quantification of these determinants may prove useful to monitor therapeutic efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer, especially those who are being treated with antiangiogenic therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of CancerSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207