Recombinant FVIIa in the management of intracerebral haemorrhage in severe thrombocytopenia unresponsive to platelet‐enhancing treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a dramatic and potentially life-threatening presentation of children with thrombocytopenia. Management is limited to supportive care. Recent evidence suggests that ongoing bleeding following the initial ICH may result in greater neurological morbidity and mortality. Haemostatic agents, including recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a product licensed for use in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors, may be helpful in reducing bleeding in children with refractory thrombocytopenia. We present the case of a 16-year-old girl with severe refractory immune thrombocytopenia, who presented with a major ICH and responded to treatment that included rFVIIa and platelet transfusions. The dose of rFVIIa was empirically chosen and based on reported cases in the literature. The case highlights a number of issues regarding off-label use of rFVIIa and demonstrates the need to prospectively collect accurate information on the off-label use of this new potentially useful medication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".