Hydrodynamic and thermal experimentation on square‐based spouted beds for polymer upgrading and unit scale‐up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the results from an extensive experimentation on polyester chips heating, crystallization and upgrading in three different size spouted bed units: a cylindrical 0.15 m diameter × 1.3 m tall, a 0.35 m square‐based × 2.1 m tall parallelepiped and a sextuple multi‐spouting 0.7 × 1.05 m 2 demonstration reactor for solid state post‐polymerization. The first apparatus was finalized to measuring several process operating variables (maximum gas temperature at the inlet, overall heat transfer coefficient and particle agglomeration tendency); the second unit provided the hydrodynamical data necessary to scale‐up the system, insert into a PET upgrading process of 30 ton/day operating capacity and partially replace a bubbling fluidized bed heating/crystallizing unit. The ultimate goal of the project consisted in intensifying the process design by saving gas compression and thermal energy. The hydrodynamical findings of the squared modular unit were compared against several existing correlations: Manurung's equations for the maximum pressure drop and the pressure drop at stable spouting required a minimal alteration; Mathur and Gishler's equation properly fitted the experimental minimum spouting velocity. The continuously operating multiple spouting apparatus showed that regulating the solids level was an issue mainly due to the very large particle throughput, if related to the mixing efficiency of each module; reciprocal interference between spouted bed cells was manifested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".