Competition between Diradical Stepwise and Concerted Mechanisms in Chalcogeno-Diels−Alder Reactions: A Density Functional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chalcogeno-Diels-Alder reactions of H(2)C=X (X = S, Se, Te) with butadiene, with trans,trans- and cis,trans-2,4-hexadiene, as well as of ethylene with thio-, seleno-, and telluroacrolein and reactions of thioformaldehyde with thioacrolein are examined theoretically. The B3LYP exchange-correlation functional with the 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ(d) basis sets is employed. Stepwise diradical and concerted pathways are considered for all reactants. A modified concerted mechanism via a pre-reaction complex followed by a concerted transition state is studied for thioformaldehyde reacting with thioacrolein. The stepwise diradical pathways are predicted to be energetically less favorable than the concerted pathways for all cases considered. Even the sterically hindered reaction between selenoformaldehyde and cis,trans-2,4-hexadiene prefers a concerted path. It is a considerable challenge to reverse this energy preference for the concerted reaction given that both electronic and steric factors act to increase or decrease the activation energies of the concerted and diradical stepwise paths in the same way. A modified concerted mechanism operates for reagents with very small HOMO-LUMO gaps such as thioformaldehyde and thioacrolein. This mechanism is completely synchronous, with a vanishingly small barrier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".