Symposium on International Optoelectronics Association: A forum for international cooperation in optical fibre communications and related technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical fibre communications is a global business. Communications architectures, systems and components are made all over the world, and are being used to build the internet which is an international enterprise. Competition, whether in research, development or commercial exploitation, is also international. Networking on an international scale is a necessity to stay synchronized with key market developments and roadmaps for the future. The International Optoelectronics Association is a grouping of 10 photonics industry associations located in Asia, North America and Europe, forming a platform for international cooperation. These are: Canadian Photonics Consortium, EPIC, KAPID, OIDA, OITDA, Optech-Net Deutschland, PIDA, SOA, and SwissLaserNet. The IOA is responding to the globalization of the internet by coordinating its roadmapping activities to give a comprehensive overview of photonic technology developments in key areas: optical communications, displays, solid-state lighting, photovoltaics, lasers and sensors. In this symposium, IOA member organizations will present an overview of broadband internet and fibre-to-the-home.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".