MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003075952 · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3250-7

Registration and design alterations of clinical trials in critical care: a cross-sectional observational study

2014· review· en· W2003075952 on OpenAlexaff
Vijay Anand, Damon C. Scales, Christopher S. Parshuram, Brian P. Kavanagh

Bibliographic record

VenueIntensive Care Medicine · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyRandomized controlled trialClinical trialProtocol (science)Sample size determinationTrial registrationMEDLINEAnesthesiologyIntensive careEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineAlternative medicineInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.246
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.528
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2460.528
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.021
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.974
GPT teacher head0.744
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
DomainReporting
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIntensive Care MedicineSame topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsFrench-language works237,207