Oropharyngeal Swallowing Disorders in Parkinson?s Disease: revisited
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Swallowing impairments in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) affect patients ’ nutritional status, the oral administration of medication, and of course quality-of-life, even in the earlier stages of the disease. Here, we provide a synopsis of the current state of neurological diagnosis and the clinical value of the assessment for nutritional status and swallowing impairments in patients with PD. The recent position statement by European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD) on the clinical assessment of dysphagic PD patients is also reviewed and discussed. Here, we also attempt to summarize and explain the recent findings from neurophysiological studies attempting to underpin the underlying mechanisms of the disease, preceding a short review of the therapeutic approaches. With this review, we aim to increase awareness for the deliberating consequences of swallowing impairments and provide a range of unanswered questions on different levels (physiological, neurophysiological, assessment and therapeutic procedures). Further investigations and collaborative large-scale research studies together with neurophysiological studies seem to be warranted in order to shape more effective clinical practice in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".