MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003243092 · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0034

La préposition en français. By Ludo Melis. Paris: Ophrys, 2003. Pp. 150. ISBN 2708010492. €10.

2006· article· en· W2003243092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld EnglishesLexisVarieties of EnglishLinguisticsPronunciationHistoryVariation (astronomy)British EnglishAmerican EnglishPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: World Englishes: An introduction by Gunnel Melchers and Philip Shaw Liwei Gao World Englishes: An introduction. By Gunnel Melchers and Philip Shaw. (The English language series.) London: Arnold, 2003. Pp. x, 229. ISBN 0340718889. $24.95. This book presents a description of global variation of English in lexis, grammar, phonology, and pragmatics. It also includes sections on the principles of linguistic variation, the roots of English, the spread of English, and the future of English. The book is intended as a linguistic textbook for readers who are acquainted with basic terminologies in linguistics. The book contains seven chapters. In Ch. 1, ‘The roots of English’, Melchers and Shaw provide a review of the early development of English from around 450 ad to the latter half of the nineteenth century, when the pronunciation of English became standardized. Ch. 2, ‘The spread of English’, discusses the historical spread of English in different countries and regions, which has resulted in English’s reaching almost every corner of the globe. In Ch. 3, ‘Variation in English’, M&S provide a unique framework for the description of varieties of English. In so doing, the authors set up the basis for the detailed analysis of individual varieties in Chs. 4–6. In addition, this chapter discusses the dimensions for the classification of world Englishes. Ch. 4, ‘The inner circle’, discusses native varieties of English in the world. Countries and regions examined include England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Liberia, and the Caribbean. Aside from linguistic descriptions, the authors also present a general overview of each of these countries and regions, its people, and its general linguistic situation. In Ch. 5, ‘The outer circle’, M&S discuss varieties of English in regions that were colonized by English-speaking countries. After an introduction to the social and political issues involved in the use of English and the common features of the ‘New Englishes’ (John T. Platt, Heidi Weber, and Mian Lian Ho, The New Englishes, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984), M&S provide a descriptive account of English in South Asia, Africa, Southeast Asia, and other regions including the Mediterranean, the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean, Papua New Guinea, and the Pacific. Again, this chapter includes not only the linguistic description of English varieties but also a brief introduction to the social history of the countries and regions examined. Ch. 6, ‘The expanding circle’, deals with countries and regions where English is learne primarily as a foreign language. Issues discussed include the rise of English, domains for English, essential features of expanding-circle English, the possible influence of English on other languages, and implications for the choice of a teaching model. In Ch. 7, ‘What’s next’, M&S discuss the future of English. They identify three major forces responsible for the development of English: US power, globalization, and information technology. Following the main text, this book includes two appendices: one is a presentation of the speakers whose speech is included on the accompanying CD, and the other contains reading questions for each chapter. Reference and an index are included at the end. Liwei Gao Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Copyright © 2006 Linguistic Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguageSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207