Relationship between genotype and skeletal phenotype in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heritable bone fragility disorder that in the majority of cases is caused by mutations in COL1A1 or COL1A2, the genes that encode the two collagen type I alpha chains, alpha1(I) and alpha2(I). In this study, we examined the relationship between collagen type I mutations and bone densitometric and histomorphometric findings in pediatric OI patients who had not received bisphosphonate treatment. Lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (LS aBMD) was measured in 192 patients (99 girls, 93 boys; age range 3 weeks to 16.9 years) who had either COL1A1 mutations leading to haploinsufficiency (n = 52) or mutations that lead to the substitution of glycine by another amino acid in the triple-helical domain of either the alpha1(I) (n = 58) or the alpha2(I) chain (n = 82). Compared with patients with helical mutations, patients with COL1A1 haploinsufficiency on average were taller and heavier and had higher LS aBMD. After adjustment for age, sex, and height Z-scores, the mean LS aBMD Z-scores were -4.0 for the haploinsufficiency group and -4.7 for both helical mutation groups. In the whole patient population, the average LS aBMD Z-score was higher by 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.0) in girls than in boys. Iliac bone histomorphometry (in a subgroup of 96 patients) showed that outer bone size (core width) and trabecular bone volume were similar between genotypic groups, but cortical width was 49% higher in the haploinsufficiency group compared with patients with helical mutations in alpha2(I). Bone turnover parameters were lower in the haploinsufficiency group than in patients with helical mutations. In the group of patients with helical mutations, neither the type of alpha chain affected, nor the type of amino acid substituting for glycine, nor the position of the mutation in the alpha chain had a detectable relationship with LS aBMD or histomorphometric results. Thus patients with haploinsufficiency mutations had a milder skeletal phenotype than patients with mutations affecting glycine residues, but there was no clear genotype-phenotype correlation among patients with helical glycine mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".