MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003255063 · doi:10.1021/jf010281+

Purification and Characterization of Molybdenum Species from <i>Medicago sativa</i> (Alfalfa) Grown on Mine Tailings

2001· article· en· W2003255063 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Surridge, Ted S. Sorensen, W. Majak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsMedicago sativaMolybdenumExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyChemistryElutionSize-exclusion chromatographyMolybdateIon exchangeAqueous solutionIon chromatographyNuclear chemistryBotanyInorganic chemistryIonBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extraction, purification, and identification procedures were developed for the chemical investigation of molybdenum (Mo) in freeze-dried aerial portions of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) collected from a reclaimed tailings pond at the Highland Valley Copper mine in British Columbia. The purification procedures were guided by ICP and colorimetric analyses. The methods included development of an efficient aqueous extraction protocol, sample cleanup by partitioning against n-butanol, and filtration through diatomaceous earth. Further purification was achieved by anion-exchange chromatography, elution with aqueous NaCl, and desalting by gel filtration. Final purification of the Mo-containing fraction was carried out using preparative anion-exchange HPLC. Molybdenum was found to be present in its purified form as the molybdate anion (MoO(4)(2-)) primarily on the basis of multinuclear ((1)H, (13)C, and (95)Mo) NMR studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207