MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003307617 · doi:10.3938/jkps.65.935

Hamiltonian reduction and exact solutions to Einstein’s equations

2014· article· en· W2003307617 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. H. Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Korean Physical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaKonkuk University
KeywordsMinkowski spacePhysicsMathematical physicsLinearized gravitySpacetimeClassical mechanicsGeneral relativityHypersurfaceSpacetime symmetriesEquations of motionIntroduction to the mathematics of general relativityHamiltonian (control theory)Einstein field equationsEinsteinNumerical relativityMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum field theory in curved spacetime

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an application of the recently proposed Hamiltonian reduction in the (2+2) formalism of general relativity under no symmetry assumptions, I present three exact solutions to Einstein’s equations, namely, the Minkowski spacetime, the plane symmetric solution of Taub, and the Kasner spacetime, by solving Hamilton’s equations of motion governed by the non-vanishing true gravitational Hamiltonian in the privileged spacetime coordinates. The true Hamiltonian is a local function of the free data only, namely, the conformal two metric and its conjugate momentum, and depends explicitly on the physical time which is identified as the area element of the cross section of a null hypersurface. Possibilities of constructing the general solution to Einstein’s equations in terms of the freely specifiable true gravitational degrees of freedom are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Korean Physical SocietySame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207