MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003313314 · doi:10.2310/7070.2001.19965

Metastatic Hypernephroma to the Head and Neck: Unusual Case Reports and Review of the Literature

2001· article· en· W2003313314 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reni Sabo, Moti Sela, Gideon Sabo, Pearl Herskovitz, Raphael Feinmesser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParanasal sinusesHead and neckThyroidLesionPresentation (obstetrics)MetastasisAdenocarcinomaSoft palateRenal cell carcinomaParotid glandRadiologyPathologySurgeryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypernephroma is one of the most common tumours to spread by extranodal metastases to the head and neck. We herein report on six patients with unusual metastatic hypernephroma to the head and neck area. In two of the six cases, the metastatic tumour in the head and neck was the presenting symptom, and the renal tumour was secondarily detected. Metastatic hypernephroma to the head and neck area has been demonstrated mostly in the paranasal sinuses, parotid gland, and the mandible. Among the six cases presented, four belong to the above-mentioned group, but the other two are rather rare cases, one metastatic to the nasopharynx and soft palate and the other to both lobes of the thyroid gland. Hypernephroma should be sought and excluded whenever a metastatic lesion is encountered in the head and neck area, even if the metastatic lesion is the first clinical presentation. The diagnosis of metastatic hypernephroma should be suspected in any patient with even a remote history of renal cell carcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207