MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003322484 · doi:10.1109/icc.2010.5502457

A Practical Algorithm for Realizing GDFE Precoder for Multiuser MIMO Systems

2010· article· en· W2003322484 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sudhanshu Gaur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPrecodingMIMOComputational complexity theoryComputer scienceAlgorithmCovariance matrixControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that multiuser multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) systems can achieve superior data rates compared to single user MIMO links. The improvement in data rates offered by the MU-MIMO systems is dependent on the design of precoding scheme for the broadcast channel (BC). A precoding scheme based on generalized decision feedback equalizer (GDFE) is known to achieve MIMO BC capacity. However, GDFE precoder suffers from huge computational complexity and is not suitable for practical systems. Much of computational cost of implementing a GDFE precoder can be attributed to its reliance on the covariance matrix corresponding to the ``least favorable noise'', which has prohibitive computational complexity. In this paper, we provide an alternative framework for realizing a GDFE precoder, which avoids the need to compute ``least favorable noise''. While maintaining capacity optimality of the GDFE precoder, the proposed algorithm has significantly lower complexity that is comparable to other MU-MIMO precoding schemes. Additionally, the proposed algorithm provides a useful tradeoff between desired complexity and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207