MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003334260 · doi:10.5558/tfc85878-6

Preliminary investigation of the effects of timber harvesting on the activity status of beaver lodges in central Ontario, Canada

2009· article· en· W2003334260 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Lynn Landriault, Brian J. Naylor, Stephen C. Mills, Dianna Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and Forestry
FundersMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsBeaverShoreGeographyCastor canadensisWetlandForestryEcologyEnvironmental scienceFisheryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beavers (Castor canadensis) are widely considered a keystone species in boreal and northern temperate forest ecosystems and are seasonally dependent on intolerant hardwood tree species for food. We used existing data to investigate the effects of timber harvesting on the activity status of beaver lodges in central Ontario, Canada. Beaver lodges were initially visited from 1976 to 1979 and active lodges were revisited in 1994. We analyzed a sample of 100 lodges. Fifty had some timber harvesting within 400 m of the lodge, 41 of which had harvest within 100 m of the shoreline (subsequently referred to as shoreline harvest). We differentiated timber harvest by type (clearcut vs. partial cut), years since harvest, and location for each lodge. Clearcut timber harvesting appeared to have a positive effect on the occupancy of beaver lodges. Seventy-three percent of lodges adjacent to shoreline clearcut areas were active, whereas only 34% of lodges with no shoreline harvest were active. We developed logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between presence of timber harvest and activity status based on harvest location, harvest type, years since harvest, and water feature (pond, stream, lake, or wetland). Using Akaike’s Information Criterion, our modeling suggested that the presence of a 21- to 35-year-old shoreline clearcut adjacent to a lodge, combined with the associated water feature type, was the best predictor of lodge activity. However, our dataset included only a small sample of lodges in this harvest category (n = 11). While these results are viewed as preliminary, they do suggest that further investigation into the effects of shoreline timber harvest and shoreline reserves on habitat suitability for beavers is warranted. Key words: beaver, beaver pond, boreal, clearcut, forestry, Great Lakes – St. Lawrence, natural disturbance, Ontario, partial harvest, riparian, shoreline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207