MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003351156 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0301718x

RESULTS FROM THE PURE <font>D<sub>2</sub>O</font> PHASE OF THE SUDBURY NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY

2003· article· en· W2003351156 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSolar neutrinoAsymmetryNeutrinoNuclear physicsFlux (metallurgy)Particle physicsSolar neutrino problemNeutrino oscillationKinetic energyElectronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory is a 1000 T D2O Cerenkov detector that is sensitive to 8 B and hep solar neutrinos. Both Charged Current and Neutral Current interaction rates on deuterons as well as the Elastic Scattering interaction rate on electrons can be measured simultaneously. Assuming an undistorted 8 B neutrino spectrum, the total flux measured with the NC reaction is [Formula: see text], which is consistent with solar models. The νe component of the 8 B solar flux is [Formula: see text] for a kinetic energy threshold of 5 MeV. The non-νe component is [Formula: see text], which is 5.3σ greater than zero, giving strong evidence for solar νe flavor transformation. The Day-Night Asymmetry for the Charged Current interaction is [Formula: see text]. If the total flux of active neutrinos is additionally constrained to have no asymmetry, the νe asymmetry is found to be [Formula: see text]. Combined with other solar neutrino data, a global MSW oscillation analysis strongly favors the Large Mixing Angle (LMA) solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207