<i>In vivo</i> brain <sup>31</sup>P‐MRS: measuring the phospholipid resonances at 4 Tesla from small voxels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An optimized phosphorous ((31)P) three-dimensional chemical-shift imaging (3D-CSI) protocol was developed at 4 T to study the phospholipid metabolism from discrete regions in the human brain without the need for (1)H-decoupling or nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE). In this study, a spherically bound, weighted average, random point omission 3D-CSI technique was developed and tested, based on methods proposed in the literature. The technique yields a significant (p < 0.001, two-tailed, 5% confidence level) increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) efficiency over conventional 3D-CSI (phantom 32%), without an increase in voxel bleedthrough. An automated time-domain fitting procedure utilizing prior spectral knowledge quantified the individual brain phospholipid metabolites from 15 cm(3) effective (8.0 cm(3) nominal) volumes from the left/right-parieto-occipital cortex and left/right thalamus in 10 normal volunteers. Individual constituents from the phosphomonoester (PME) region; phosphoethanolamine (PEth), phosphocholine (PCh) and the phosphodiester (PDE) region; glycerophosphoethanolamine (GPEth), glycerophosphocholine (GPCh) and membrane phospholipids (MP) were separately quantified to assess the precision of our method at 4 T against previous (1)H-decoupled (31)P-MRS brain studies at lower fields and much larger voxels. Derived concentrations (mM/l tissue) for PEth, PCh, GPEth, GPCh and MP in the left-parieto-occipital cortex were 0.81 +/- 0.21, 0.46 +/- 0.14, 0.74 +/- 0.30, 1.15 +/- 0.43 and 1.54 +/- 0.95 mM, respectively, and 0.94 +/- 0.16, 0.46 +/- 0.17, 0.83 +/- 0.22, 1.14 +/- 0.40 and 1.26 +/- 0.78 mM for the right parieto-occipital cortex. Derived concentrations (mM/l tissue) for PEth, PCh, GPEth, GPCh and MP in the left-thalamus were 0.69 +/- 0.18, 0.42 +/- 0.16, 0.63 +/- 0.20, 1.05 +/- 0.42 and 0.93 +/- 0.56 mM, respectively, and 0.68 +/- 0.24, 0.34 +/- 0.18, 0.60 +/- 0.23, 1.09 +/- 0.36 and 0.74 +/- 0.48 mM for the right-thalamus. This is the first study to our knowledge that has been able to quantify each of these individual phospholipid metabolites from such small voxels in the brain within a clinically reasonable scan time and without (1)H-decoupling or NOE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".