Detection of Ovine Antibody to<i>Brucella ovis</i>by Indirect Enzyme Immunoassay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because some batch-to-batch variation in the preparation of rough lipopolysaccharide (RLPS) from Brucella ovis has been experienced, several protocols were tested to establish the most reliable method for detection of antibody in indirect enzyme immunoassay. An early version of the assay gave a performance index (PI=sum of optimum percent sensitivity and percent specificity, determined by receiver operator characteristic analysis) of 198.6. This assay used RLPS from B. ovis as the antigen and a monoclonal antibody specific for bovine IgG(1) heavy chain-enzyme conjugate for detection. This was not repeatable using other batches of antigen. Newer versions of the assay generally had decreased sensitivity values, giving PIs of 193. Use of a recombinant protein A/G-enzyme conjugate did not improve the PI (PI=190), giving reduced specificity and higher sensitivity. The final version used B. abortus RB51 RLPS as the antigen and protein A/G-enzyme conjugate for detection, giving a PI of 197. Because of the batch uniformity of the B. abortus RB51 RLPS and the versatility of the protein A/G-enzyme conjugate, the latter version appears to be the most useful for diagnostic serology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".