MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003484607 · doi:10.1115/ipc2012-90323

An Experimental Study on J(CTOD)-R Curves of Single Edge Tension Specimens for X80 Steel

2012· article· en· W2003484607 on OpenAlexaff
Enyang Wang, Wenxing Zhou, Guowu Shen, Da-Ming Duan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrack tip opening displacementTension (geology)Materials scienceFracture toughnessComposite materialFracture (geology)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionStructural engineeringFracture mechanicsCrack closureUltimate tensile strengthEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fracture toughness testing of SE(T) and SE(B) specimens is carried out to experimentally develop J(CTOD)-R curves for the X80 steel based on the unloading compliance method. Six clamped (two shallow-cracked side-grooved, two deep-cracked side-grooved, and two deep-cracked plain-sided) SE(T) and two shallow-cracked side-grooved SE(B) specimens are tested. The impact of crack length on the J(CTOD)-R curves of the SE(T) specimens is investigated. The J(CTOD)-R curves of the shallow-cracked SE(T) specimens are significantly higher than those of the deep-cracked SE(T) specimens once the crack extension exceeds 0.5 mm. A comparison of the J(CTOD)-R curves associated with the SE(B) and SE(T) specimens suggests that the crack tip constraint for the SE(T) specimens is lower than that of the SE(B) specimens with the same nominal initial crack length, and that shallow-cracked SE(T) specimens have less constraint at the crack tip than deep-cracked SE(T) specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207