MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003506888 · doi:10.1504/ier.2003.053900

Managing Mexico: the maquiladoras, environmental impoverishment, and the role of multinational corporations

2003· article· en· W2003506888 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Joan Zilney

Bibliographic record

VenueInterdisciplinary Environmental Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementMultinational corporationGovernment (linguistics)LegislationPopulationBusinessEnvironmental protectionNatural resource economicsInternational tradePolitical scienceEnvironmental planningDevelopment economicsGeographyEconomicsLawFinanceEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mexico suffers from numerous environmental problems including air and water quality, sewage concerns, and high toxicity levels in soils. These troubles are intensified in the maquiladoras due to increased industrial activity and high population concentrations. To help mitigate the poor ecological conditions the Mexican government enacted the General Law in 1988. This legislation provided the framework for the Side Agreement incorporated in the North American Free Trade Agreement. The level of enforcement of regional and national laws dealing with environmental protection in Mexico are examined to ascertain whether such measures have positively altered the conditions along the border. Emphasis is given to the level of influence American–owned firms exercise in the maquiladoras, which may shape the enforcement of environmental laws. Connections among American MNCs, the Mexican government, maquiladora communities, and environmental degeneration are illustrated. The research demonstrates the complexity of ecological problems in Mexico beyond water and land pollution, and market failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterdisciplinary Environmental ReviewSame topicEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207