MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A170: High-content screening for inhibitors of oncogenic transcription by c-Myc

2009· article· en· W2003518997 on OpenAlexaff
Tony Collins, Amanda R. Wasylishen, Linda Z. Penn, David W. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFörster resonance energy transferFluorescenceBimolecular fluorescence complementationProtein-fragment complementation assayProtein–protein interactionComputational biologyTranscription factorFluorescence microscopeSmall moleculeBiologyChemistryBiochemistryCancer researchCell biologyGeneComplementation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is evidence that Myc partners with another molecule called TRRAP to regulate genes required for transformation. Our hypothesis is that blocking the interaction of Myc with TRRAP will selectively kill breast cancer cells. Traditional drug screening approaches to identify compounds that will break apart two interacting proteins have rarely been successful. However, our approach is to screen compounds in live breast cancer cells for those that prevent Myc and TRRAP from binding to each other. Since the cell is constantly replacing Myc, a compound that prevents it from binding TRRAP should kill even established tumors. Importantly, we previously mapped the places on Myc and TRRAP that bind them together and showed they don't involve the parts of the protein involved in other important functions. Therefore, compounds we find that prevent Myc-TRRAP binding should not be toxic to normal cells. Methods: We have established a new assay in which Myc and TRRAP are expressed as fusion proteins to Cerulean and Citrine fluorescence proteins, respectively. We are developing two different but related assays for the interaction between the two proteins. In one we rely on proximity resulting in complementation between non-fluorescent fragments of the Cerulean fluorescence protein. In this assay heterodimerization results in increased fluorescence. In the other assay proximity results in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the Cerulean and Citrine fluorescence proteins. We detect FRET by fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM). Results: A novel robotic microscope that can automatically perform high speed FLIM and thereby detect Myc-TRRAP binding quickly and accurately has been assembled and tested. Our automated microscope has had an environmental stage for live cell imaging fitted and tested. Both FRET standards and constructs based on the Cerulean-Myc / TRRAP-Citrine pair have been measured to validate the assay. Cell lines are being optimized for use for screening. Conclusions: High speed FLIM can be used to detect FRET between Cerulean-Myc and TRRAP-Citrine in live cells. Using our automated microscope we can test individually the effect of large numbers of small molecules in live breast cancer cells. This will let us identify compounds that are not only effective but that get into breast cancer cells and are not toxic to normal cells. Relevance/Impact: To stimulate the development of new drugs effective against a wide spectrum of cancers, we are identifying small drug like molecules that disrupt the function of a particularly potent cell growth gene called Myc, which is often misregulated in breast cancer. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A170.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207