MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrophysiology extends the phenotypic spectrum of X-linked myopathy with excessive autophagy

2005· article· en· W2003683510 on OpenAlexaff
I. Munteanu, Cameron Ackerley, Gevork N. Mnatzakanian, J. T. Kissel, Berge A. Minassian

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersUniversity of Rochester
KeywordsSarcolemmaMyopathyMyocyteAutophagyMyofilamentSkeletal muscleVacuolePathologyBiologyCell biologyInflammationSarcoplasmAnatomyMedicineEndoplasmic reticulumCytoplasmImmunologyApoptosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-linked myopathy with excessive autophagy (XMEA) (MIM 310440) is an X-linked recessive boyhood-onset disorder of skeletal muscle with a slowly progressive course toward wasting of proximal muscles of the lower extremities and wheelchair dependency by the fifth decade of life. Involvement of distal leg muscles and upper extremities is clinically evident late in the disease.1–4 Skeletal muscle pathology is characterized by a constellation of rare and unique features. Autophagic vacuoles containing cellular debris are present in the sarcoplasm, and at the sarcolemma extruding their contents to the extracellular space. Myofibers containing vacuoles have multiple layers of basement membrane. Intense calcium accumulation is seen at the myofiber periphery, in the absence of necrosis. Extensive deposition of complement membrane attack complex (MAC) is present at the myofiber surface, without resultant cell lysis. Finally, class I major histocompatibility complex is expressed, despite the absence of inflammation.1–4 Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are normal but …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207