MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003817290 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2012.6289222

Portable and Performant Userspace SCTP Stack

2012· article· en· W2003817290 on OpenAlexaff
Brad Penoff, Alan Wagner, Michael Tüxen, Irene Rüngeler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStream Control Transmission ProtocolComputer scienceLinux kernelProtocol stackOperating systemEmbedded systemKernel (algebra)ExploitThroughputStack (abstract data type)Computer networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of only two new transport protocols introduced in the last 30 years is the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). SCTP enables capabilities like additional throughput and fault tolerance for multihomed hosts. An SCTP implementation is included with the Linux kernel and another implementation called sctplib functions successfully in userspace on several platforms but unfortunately neither of these implementations have all of the latest features nor do they perform as well as the FreeBSD kernel implementation of SCTP. We were motivated to produce a portable implementation of the FreeBSD kernel SCTP stack that operates in userspace of any system because of both our desires to obtain a higher performance SCTP stack for Linux as well as to exploit recent developments in hardware virtualization and transport protocol onloading. Unlike any other userspace transport implementation for TCP or SCTP, our userspace SCTP stack simultaneously achieves similar throughput and latency as the Linux kernel TCP stack, without compromising on any of the transport's features as well as maintaining true portability across multiple operating systems and devices. We create a callback API and implement a threshold to control its usage; our userspace SCTP stack with these optimizations obtains higher throughput than the Linux kernel implementation of SCTP. We describe our userspace SCTP stack's design and demonstrate how it gives similar throughput and latency on Linux as the kernel TCP implementation, with the benefits of the new features of SCTP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207