Bibliographic record
Abstract
he next-generation successor to the Hubble Space Telescope will be known as the James Webb Space Telescope, in honour of James E Webb, NASA's second administrator, who led the agency during a major era of expansion from February 1961 to October 1968.Although Webb is best known for leading Apollo and the series of lunar exploration programmes that culminated in the first human landings on the Moon, he also initiated a space-science programme that included America's first missions to Venus and Mars.The Webb Telescope is scheduled for launch in 2010 aboard an expendable launch vehicle.It will take about three months for the spacecraft to reach its destination, the second Lagrange Point (L2), 1.5 million km from Earth.At this distance, it will be too far away for servicing by space shuttle astronauts, but a shield on only one side of the observatory can protect the instruments from the light and heat of both the Sun and Earth.As a result, the observatory can be cooled to -200 °C without complicated refrigeration equipment, making infrared observation possible.Webb will carry a segmented primary mirror at least 6 m in diameter, folded during the launch.The new telescope will carry a near-infrared camera, a multi-object spectrometer and a mid-infrared camera/spectrometer.The UK
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".