MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003895468 · doi:10.2118/116149-ms

Successful Field Application in Continuous DTS Monitoring Under Harsh Environment of SAGD Wells Using New Optical-Fiber Technology: Case Study From Canada

2008· article· en· W2003895468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiten Kaura, José Sierra

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical fiberHydrogenPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceFiberAbsorption (acoustics)Environmental scienceFossil fuelOptoelectronicsProcess engineeringComposite materialWaste managementGeologyChemistryComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of optical fibers in the oil and gas industry is becoming more viable for several applications, particularly in permanent reservoir monitoring, such as distributed temperature sensing (DTS) and optical pressure transducers. However, poor long-term performance of fibers, especially at elevated temperatures, is still an issue yet to be fully resolved. This problem is critically important in steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) applications, where wells operate in extreme conditions of high temperatures, often exceeding 250°C, as well as in high pressures within a hydrogen-rich environment. Optical fiber performance is seriously affected by many factors, including: Hydrogen ingressionThermal resistance of the materialsMechanical resistance of the fiber Exposure of optical fibers to hydrogen changes the performance of the fibers through what is referred to in the industry as "hydrogen aging" or "hydrogen darkening." Hydrogen darkening is increased absorption or light loss due to various chemical species in the glass fiber resulting from the presence of hydrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207