Enforcement of γδ-lineage commitment by the pre–T-cell receptor in precursors with weak γδ-TCR signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing thymocytes bifurcate from a bipotent precursor into αβ- or γδ-lineage T cells. Considering this common origin and the fact that the T-cell receptor (TCR) β-, γ-, and δ-chains simultaneously rearrange at the double negative (DN) stage of development, the possibility exists that a given DN cell can express and transmit signals through both the pre-TCR and γδ-TCR. Here, we tested this scenario by defining the differentiation outcomes and criteria for lineage choice when both TCR-β and γδ-TCR are simultaneously expressed in Rag2(-/-) DN cells via retroviral transduction. Our results showed that Rag2(-/-) DN cells expressing both TCRs developed along the γδ-lineage, down-regulated CD24 expression, and up-regulated CD73 expression, showed a γδ-biased gene-expression profile, and produced IFN-γ in response to stimulation. However, in the absence of Inhibitor of DNA-binding 3 expression and strong γδ-TCR ligand, γδ-expressing cells showed a lower propensity to differentiate along the γδ-lineage. Importantly, differentiation along the γδ-lineage was restored by pre-TCR coexpression, which induced greater down-regulation of CD24, higher levels of CD73, Nr4a2, and Rgs1, and recovery of functional competence to produce IFN-γ. These results confirm a requirement for a strong γδ-TCR ligand engagement to promote maturation along the γδ T-cell lineage, whereas additional signals from the pre-TCR can serve to enforce a γδ-lineage choice in the case of weaker γδ-TCR signals. Taken together, these findings further cement the view that the cumulative signal strength sensed by developing DN cells serves to dictate its lineage choice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".