Atomic-scale yield and dislocation nucleation in KBr
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atomic-scale plastic deformation on a KBr(100) surface has been produced and characterized by use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) in ultrahigh vacuum. The structure of displaced material was imaged using noncontact mode AFM after first implementing the sharp silicon tip as an indenter. After indentation the KBr(100) surface is found to exhibit monatomic terraces which are formed via dislocation nucleation and glide. Discontinuities in the force-distance curves recorded during indentation are correlated to the creation of dislocation loops in the crystal. Incipient dislocation nucleation has been characterized as the abrupt monatomic layer displacement of the tip into the sample and the corresponding creation of monatomic terraces. The indenter radius has been found to significantly influence the lateral extent of the dislocation structure and the distribution of force discontinuities during indentation. The shear stress at the yield point was experimentally determined to be $2.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GPa}$ which is consistent with recent theoretical predictions for the ideal shear stress of KBr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".