Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Behcet's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a high frequency of pseudoaneurysm formation in patients with Behçet's disease and their inflammed and fragile tissues are difficult to manipulate. Five patients with Behçet's disease were referred to our cardiovascular surgery department for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Three of them were operated and two were treated medically. Patients that were managed medically had left anterior descending (LAD) lesions below 80% and their stable angina pectoris responded well to medication. There was no early mortality and morbidity. One patient developed pseudoaneurysm of ascending aorta and femoral artery. This patient died in the late postoperative period. At follow-up the operated patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Class I, while the medically treated patients were in CCS Class II. Mean follow-up period was 41 +/- 36.21 months. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is extremely rare detected in patients with Behçet's disease. The affected patients are usually young males. Coronary artery bypass grafting is also rarely performed in these patients and long-term results of such operations are not available in the literature. We present five patients with Behçet's disease that had CAD, three operated and two medically treated, and report their long-term results. We suggest a conservative approach in patients with Behçet's disease because of the high risk of pseudoaneurysm formation in the postoperative period. If CABG cannot be avoided we recommend operating the patients on the beating heart with minimal aortic manipulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".