MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003981451 · doi:10.1145/1321211.1321213

Eucalyptus

2007· article· en· W2003981451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of CASCON · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersCanarie
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningWorkflowModular designQuality of serviceWorld Wide WebArchitectureService (business)MashupWeb serviceComputer networkDatabaseWeb developmentOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the support of user configurable high speed networks, the emerging e-Infrastructure allows seamless sharing of expensive scientific resources. These resources are often running on a variety of platforms, have different bandwidth and QoS requirements, require specific configuration by technical experts, and in most cases cannot be accessed through a single point of entry. To address these issues, we propose an extensible, reliable, and simple software architecture to share the applications and resources over hybrid networks, and hide the tools' logistical and provisioning complexities. This paper explores the design and implementation of Eucalyptus, and describes how it leverages the benefits of a Service-oriented Architecture (SoA) to provide a highly adaptable, modular, and loosely coupled solution to configure and manage resources needed by users collaborating over the net. We present our methodology to wrap functions of resources into Web services, and integrate the new Web services into the Eucalyptus platform in a generic way. The streams of the events from these resources are captured. This information is used for monitoring resources' activities and diagnosing any error that may arise. We provide a workflow management service allowing users to orchestrate services based on the description of the resources, their dependencies and the captured streams to perform certain tasks. We also propose a combination of Web services and peer to peer technologies to support users in different communities and different network layers, and to decentralize resource management. Eucalyptus was demonstrated to be effective in assisting architects across multiple sites to effectively participate in a shared design session.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it