MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004009238 · doi:10.1021/mp700102q

Regulation of Transporters by Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Implications during Inflammation

2007· review· en· W2004009238 on OpenAlexaff
Shirley Teng, Micheline Piquette‐Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnane X receptorConstitutive androstane receptorNuclear receptorTransporterReceptorInflammationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 2PharmacologyBiologyCell biologyATP-binding cassette transporterBiochemistryImmunologyTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane transporters play a critical role in the absorption, distribution, and elimination of both endogenous substrates and xenobiotics. Defects in transporter function can lead to altered drug disposition including toxicity or loss of efficacy. Inflammation is one condition during which variable drug response has been demonstrated, and this can be attributed, at least in part, to changes in the expression of transporter genes. Thus, knowledge of the mechanisms behind transporter regulation can significantly contribute to our ability to predict variations in drug disposition among individuals and during inflammatory disease. The discovery of several xenobiotic-activated nuclear hormone receptors during the past decade including the pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and farnesoid X receptor has contributed greatly toward this endeavor. These receptors regulate the expression of transporters such as P-glycoprotein, MRP2, MRP3, BCRP, and OATP2 (Oatp1a1/OATP1B1), all of which undergo altered expression during an inflammatory response. Nuclear receptors may therefore play an important role in mediating this effect. This review presents what is currently known about the role of nuclear receptors in transporter regulation during inflammation. The use of this knowledge toward understanding interindividual variation in drug response and drug interactions during inflammation as well toward the development of therapeutics to treat transporter-related diseases will also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207