MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004017815 · doi:10.1164/rccm.200303-371oc

Human Alveolar Wall Fibroblasts Directly Link Epithelial Type 2 Cells to Capillary Endothelium

2003· article· en· W2004017815 on OpenAlexaff
Faye E. Sirianni, Fanny Chu, David C. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsBasal laminaEndotheliumExtracellular matrixPathologyPopulationFibroblastEpitheliumMesenchymeCell biologyLungRespiratory epitheliumAnatomyBiologyMedicineUltrastructureCell cultureInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alveolar wall fibroblasts directly link type 2 (T2) pneumocytes to capillary endothelium through apertures in their respective basal laminae in rabbit lung. These fibroblasts provide a bridge from the capillary to the airway lumen along which leukocytes may migrate without disrupting extracellular matrix. Normal human lungs were examined by transmission electron microscopy and serial section 3D reconstruction. We found contacts between fibroblasts and T2 pneumocytes and between fibroblasts and type 1 pneumocytes that occur at holes in the epithelial basal lamina. The same fibroblast also made contact with pericytes and endothelial cells through similar apertures. A survey of 41 T2 pneumocytes revealed that 54% of T2 pneumocytes had at least one gap in their basal lamina. A morphometric analysis showed these gaps occupied approximately 5.58 +/- 1.51% (mean +/- SE) of the area underneath T2 pneumocytes. We conclude that a population of single fibroblasts link T2 pneumocytes to adjacent capillary endothelial cells in alveolar walls of human lung. We propose that fibroblasts are organized to maintain communication between epithelium and mesenchyme and to provide directional information to migrating leukocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207