MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004046925 · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.011

Moving SDM forward in Canada: milestones, public involvement, and barriers that remain

2011· article· de· W2004046925 on OpenAlexaffabout
France Légaré, Dawn Stacey, Pierre‐Gerlier Forest, Marie‐France Coutu

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsCentre for Disability Prevention and RehabilitationUniversité de SherbrookeCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecOttawa HospitalPierre Elliott Trudeau FoundationUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)Decision aidsWork (physics)Health carePublic relationsPublic involvementPrincipal (computer security)Psychological interventionPublic healthPolitical scienceBusinessMedicinePublic administrationNursingAlternative medicineEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im GesundheitswesenSame topicPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207