Preoperative Catheterization of H-Type Tracheoesophageal Fistula to Facilitate its Localization and Surgical Correction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that preoperative catheterization of H-type tracheoesophageal fistula facilitates its identification and surgical correction. METHODS: This is a case series of seven patients with H-type tracheoesophageal fistula. Diagnosis was established in three patients and suspected in two more by means of an esophagogram. Confirmation of fistula was performed by endoscopy in all patients. On the day of surgery, either a rigid bronchoscope or a nasolaryngoscope was introduced into the trachea to localize and catheterize the fistula. Because of the location of the fistula, the surgical correction was performed through the neck in five patients and through the thorax in two patients. The fistulas were easily identified surgically and the corrections were successfully performed in all cases. An extensive dissection was not required in any case. Refistulization, identified by bronchoscopic examination one week after surgery, occurred in one patient. Surgical repair was performed again using same procedure described above. All patients are currently asymptomatic and without any evidence of refistulization. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative catheterization of H-type tracheoesophageal fistula is useful to facilitate its preoperative identification, to plan the surgical approach, and to decrease operating times and the extent of surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".